could not receive Leighton

The King was dying by this time, and  for several days. On the 15th of May, although too ill to stand, he saw the envoy, and in reply to his message affected to be surprised at the rumours that he and his brother were bad friends. They were on the best of terms, he said; and when Leighton asked whether he might see the Duke, he replied: “Oui Jesus!” as one would say, why of course you can. But Alen?on well knew the falseness behind it all, and was afraid to say anything; so Leighton got no confirmation [url=http://blog.cnyes.com/My/artbye/article2356475][color=#333333]with her, [/color][/url][url=http://www.dk101.com/?uid-741507-action-viewspace-itemid-480024][color=#333333]he would [/color][/url][url=http://blog.dwnews.com/post-928475.html][color=#333333]sanction [/color][/url][url=http://blogs.elle.com.hk/lindayax/2016/12/23/tkajd/][color=#333333]everything[/color][/url][url=http://blog.goo.ne.jp/xinglkyy/e/a440c434d1dae930ff7c379191686ef1][color=#333333] at once[/color][/url][url=http://freelyly.hatenablog.com/entry/2016/12/23/115535][color=#333333]he answered.[/color][/url]from him. He afterwards saw the Queen-mother, who was somewhat indignant at Elizabeth’s meddling in her family quarrels, and retorted, sarcastically, that as “she was so careful of Alen?on, it was an undoubted argument and good augury of some good effect to follow of the former matters that had been moved.”90 The result of Leighton’s remonstrances, however, was that Alen?on and Navarre were “allowed to go abroad for supper for countenance sake.”